Tham khảo Đế_quốc_Aztec

  1. ↑ Rein Taagepera (tháng 9 năm 1997). “Expansion and Contraction Patterns of Large Polities: Context for Russia”. International Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 497. JSTOR 2600793. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00053. Truy cập ngày 7 tháng 9 năm 2018. 
  2. ↑ ēy(i)+kān tlahtō+lō+yān (3+lugar hablar+pasiva+lugar.usual) '[los] tres lugares en los que se parlamenta' Bản mẫu:Source needs translation
  3. 1 2 Smith 2009
  4. ↑ Hassig 1988
  5. ↑ Smith 2001
  6. ↑ Smith 2009 pp. 3–4
  7. ↑ Smith 1984
  8. ↑ Davies 1973, pp. 3–22
  9. ↑ Alfredo López Austin, "Aztec" in The Oxford Encyclopedia of Mesoamerican Culture, vol. 1, p. 68. Oxford University Press 2001.
  10. ↑ Smith 2009 p. 37
  11. ↑ Calnek 1978
  12. 1 2 3 Davies 1973
  13. ↑ Alvarado Tezozomoc 1975 pp. 49–51
  14. ↑ Alvarado Tezozomoc (1975), pp. 52–60
  15. ↑ Smith 2009 p. 44
  16. ↑ Alvarado Tezozomoc 1975
  17. ↑ Smith 2009 p. 46
  18. ↑ John Bierhorst (1985). A Nahuatl-English Dictionary and Concordance to the Cantares Mexicanos: With an Analytic Transcription and Grammatical Notes. Stanford University Press. tr. 319. ISBN 978-0-8047-1183-8. 
  19. ↑ Barbara A. Somervill (2009). Empire of the Aztecs. Infobase Publishing. tr. 33. ISBN 978-1-60413-149-9. 
  20. ↑ John B. Glass (ngày 18 tháng 2 năm 2015). “Annotated References”. Trong Robert Wauchope. Handbook of Middle American Indians, Volumes 14 and 15: Guide to Ethnohistorical Sources, Parts Three and Four. 14, 15. University of Texas Press. tr. 854. ISBN 978-1-4773-0688-8. 
  21. 1 2 3 4 Smith 2009 p. 47
  22. ↑
  23. ↑ Evans 2008, p. 460
  24. ↑ The term cihuācōātl literally means "woman-snake" or "female snake", and the origin of this designation is not well understood. The position was certainly not reserved for women, although the title may perhaps suggest a metaphoric dichotomy between the "masculine" Tlahtoāni dealing with external imperial affairs and the "feminine" Cihuācōātl managing the domestic affairs.
  25. ↑ Leon-Portilla 1963 p. 155
  26. 1 2 Smith 2009 p. 48
  27. 1 2 3 Evans 2008 p. 462
  28. 1 2 Duran 1994, pp. 209–210
  29. ↑ Evans 2008 pp. 456–457
  30. ↑ Evans 2008, p. 451
  31. ↑ Based on Hassig 1988.
  32. ↑ Smith 2009 pp. 47–48
  33. ↑ Smith 2009 p. 49
  34. 1 2 3 4 Pollard 1993, p. 169
  35. 1 2 3 4 5 Smith 2009 p. 51
  36. ↑ Evans 2008, p. 450
  37. 1 2 3 4 Smith 2009 p. 54
  38. ↑ Smith 2009 pp. 50–51
  39. ↑ Pollard 1993 pp. 169–170
  40. ↑ Davies 1973 p. 216
  41. ↑ Motyl, Alexander J. (2001). Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires. New York: Columbia University Press. tr. 13, 19–21, 32–36. ISBN 0-231-12110-5. 
  42. ↑ Berdan, et al. (1996), Aztec Imperial Strategies. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC
  43. ↑ Smith, Michael E. (2000), Aztec City-States. In A Comparative Study of Thirty City-State Cultures, edited by Mogens Herman Hansen, pp. 581–595. The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Copenhagen.
  44. ↑ Evans, Susan T. (2004). Ancient Mexico & Central America: Archaeology and Culture History. Thames & Hudson: New York, pp. 443–446, 449–451
  45. ↑ Coe, Michael D. (1984). Mexico, 3rd Ed. Thames & Hudson: New York, p. 156
  46. ↑ Townshend, Richard F. (2000). The Aztecs. Revised Ed. Thames & Hudson: London, pp. 200–202.
  47. 1 2 Berdan, Francis F. and Patricia Rieff Anawalt. 1992. The Codex Mendoza Vol. 1. University of California Press, p. 196
  48. ↑ Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. (1983). Aztec State Making: Ecology, Structure, and the Origin of the State. American Anthropologist, New Series (85)2, p. 273
  49. ↑ Townshend, Richard F. (2000). The Aztecs. Revised Ed. Thames & Hudson: London, p. 204.
  50. ↑ Calnek, Edward E. (1982). Patterns of Empire Formation in the Valley of Mexico, in The Inca and Aztec States: 1400–1800. Collier, Rosaldo & Wirth (Eds.) Academic Press: New York, pp. 56–59
  51. ↑ Smith, Michael E. (1986). Social Stratification in the Aztec Empire: A View from the Provinces, in American Anthropologist,(88)1, p. 74
  52. ↑ Kurtz, Donald V. (1984). Strategies of Legitimation and the Aztec State, in Ethnology, 23(4), pp. 308–309
  53. ↑ Almazán, Marco A. (1999). The Aztec States-Society: The Roots of Civil Society and Social Capital, in Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 565, p. 170.
  54. ↑ Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. (2001). Religion and state in the Aztec Empire, in Empires (Alcock et al, Eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, p. 284
  55. 1 2 Evans, pp. 470–471
  56. 1 2 Smith, Michael E. (1996). The Strategic Provinces, in Aztec Imperial Strategies. Dumbarton Oaks: Washington, D.C., pp. 1–2
  57. ↑ Coe, p. 170
  58. ↑ Chimalpahin Quauhtlehuanitzin. (1997). Codex Chimalpahin, Vol. 1. University of Oklahoma Press: Norman.
  59. ↑ Tlacopan. Updated March, 20120. Truy cập from http://members.iinet.net.au/~royalty/states/southamerica/tlacopan.html.
Bài viết này vẫn còn sơ khai. Bạn có thể giúp Wikipedia mở rộng nội dung để bài được hoàn chỉnh hơn.
Cổ đại
Trung đại
Hiện đại
Thực dân